Advisely PartnerHi Phil,
Are you seeing many Advisers/Licensees move from providing an FSG to clients to the new Website Disclosure Information and if not is there a reason why? Am I correct in understanding that we can upload our FSG as is but have to rename it as Website Disclosure Information and therefore refer to is as such in documentation, is references to the FSG in all advice docs, letters, marketing material etc would have to remove any reference to FSG and replace with website disclosure?
Advisely PartnerThanks Ataia. The ability to address the FSG obligations through the disclosure of information on an adviser’s website was an important part of DBFO Tranche 1. It ran into problems, when it was discovered that it only covered financial advice and did not cover dealing, which is an essential activity for any financial adviser helping their clients to implement the advice. Fortunately, ASIC stepped in to provide regulatory relief on this issue, however it has caused a hold up.
I might not be the closest to where this is at in the marketplace, however I understand that it is a bit mixed. Some licensees are taking advantage of it, whilst others are holding off to wait for a permanent solution to the ‘dealing’ problem. At this stage, it might be around half and half.
Thanks Phil - can you clarify if we need to replace FSG with Website Disclosure and as a result refer to it as such?
Advisely PartnerHi Ataia. I might start by saying that you do not need to move to website disclosure information. You can stay in the old world where you provide paper or electronic FSGs to clients. You can also go hybrid and use FSGs for some clients and website disclosure for other clients.
I hope that I have understood your question. If not then please respond.
