1 Reply

  • Tangelo's avatar
    Tangelo
    Icon for Advisely Partner rankAdvisely Partner
    2 years ago

    FDS requirements have been a bug bear for a while now and removing these will hopefully make an impact for Advisers, as will streamlining ongoing fee renewal and consent requirements.

    Clarity regarding SoA's and what fit for purpuse means is on everyone's radar, as is the removal of the safe harbour steps - I think these are the two that must get through (I couldn't choose between the two!). Getting some traction before Xmas would be a great gift to the industry!

Welcome to the Advisely forums!

This is where financial advice professionals from all walks of life come together to share knowledge, swap ideas, solve problems, and talk all things growth and efficiency.

Here are some tips when posting in the forums:

  • Be respectful and courteous to fellow members
  • If a reply helped you, mark it as a solution so other users can find it easily
  • Take a moment to read through our Community Guidelines
  • For Xplan support issues, it's best to raise a ticket in Iress Connect first. You can also search the discussions for posts about the same issue first before starting a new thread.
  • Keep an eye out for our 'Ask me anything (AMA)' threads – these are live text-based Q&As with industry and Xplan experts during a set period of time. Find out when the next one is happening here.
  • Don’t be shy! You don’t need to be an expert to help someone out. Many users are looking for practical advice, shared experiences, or just a fresh perspective
  • Introduce yourself and meet other members here!

We’re glad you’re here – see you around! 😁

Recent Discussions

Related Content

FAAA on QAR/super incentives

In a recent submission, the FAAA criticised the lack of "specific encouragement provided for people to seek external professional advice that is not tied to a single product solution" in the Governme...
alex.burkeDiscussions