What has been holding up the adviser registration process?
Part of the Hayne Royal Commission recommendations was to add a new registration process for advisers. You might wonder why, given that we already had a Financial Adviser Register. Well this registration obligation contains more, including a fit and proper declaration.
The primary hold up was a legislative change that the Government needed to get through first. The complication was that the Treasury Laws Amendment (2023 Measures No. 1) Bill 2023 also contained other stuff, including changes to franking credits and reforms in the TPB space. The Bill has been in the Parliament since February. It finally passed today after the Government managed to get the support of the cross bench in the Senate yesterday, through agreeing to a number of amendments.
One of those amendments, which was put through by the Greens, limited who can sit on the TPB Board and introduced a breach reporting regime for tax practitioners (including a reporting of other practitioners obligation, just like financial advisers). The Parliament is very hot on issues that can be linked to the PwC scandal. The Government pushed this through without consultation. There are a number of very unhappy groups, and rightly so; legislative change should be based upon broad consultation and a careful considered process. That was certainly not the case with these amendments.
Anyway the path is now clear for ASIC to push forward with the registration process for financial advisers.
1 Reply
- alex.burke
Advisely Team
Phil, this one had honestly slipped my mind for a bit due to all the delays. I'm still unclear on how the transition over to the ATO factors into this - do you anticipate any issues?
Welcome to the Advisely forums!
This is where financial advice professionals from all walks of life come together to share knowledge, swap ideas, solve problems, and talk all things growth and efficiency.
Here are some tips when posting in the forums:
- Be respectful and courteous to fellow members
- If a reply helped you, mark it as a solution so other users can find it easily
- Take a moment to read through our Community Guidelines
- For Xplan support issues, it's best to raise a ticket in Iress Connect first. You can also search the discussions for posts about the same issue first before starting a new thread.
- Keep an eye out for our 'Ask me anything (AMA)' threads – these are live text-based Q&As with industry and Xplan experts during a set period of time. Find out when the next one is happening here.
- Don’t be shy! You don’t need to be an expert to help someone out. Many users are looking for practical advice, shared experiences, or just a fresh perspective
- Introduce yourself and meet other members here!
We’re glad you’re here – see you around! 😁
Recent Discussions
🤓 Xplan Hint: Email Signatures That Stick!
Did you know Xplan recently updated how email and SMS signatures work when using the 'Override From Address' option? Why the Change? No more worrying about an email going out with the wrong signa...courtney.youngblutt1 month agoXplan Expert198Views3likes14CommentsSettings for client access to emails saved as Doc Notes
Does anyone know if or how I can change the standard setting in the client email template so that: Client Access = No At the moment the default is set to yes (as screen shot below) ...rebekah.young1 month agoNetwork Navigator86Views1like3Comments🤓Xplan Hint: Why not try a dynamic benchmark?
Are you using Benchmark Sets in your Cases? Have you found that sometimes, some benchmarks are simply not applicable or relevant to the client's scenario? For example, why would you complete a Risk R...laura.capozzi1 month agoXplan Expert36Views0likes1Comment

