Why Financial Advice Accountability Legislation Needs to Change Now
After my article in the IFA on CSLR and the accountability gap we currently see in Australian financial advice, I have had a number of people ask what specific legislation needs to change to tighten up accountability. Here are my thoughts https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/we-knew-coming-why-accountability-advice-must-fixed-tony-dimhe🤓Xplan Hint: DBFO consent comes to Xplan Risk Researcher
Did you know Risk Researcher now enables you to document client consent for insurance commissions? As many of you know, from 9 July 2025, advisers providing personal advice on life insurance will need to obtain informed client consent before implementing advice or receiving commissions. (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) Act 2024,) Now, you can easily record client consent using the new Insurance Commission Consent (ICC) column in Risk Researcher’s recommendations screen. It allows you to indicate whether consent has been received for each product you recommend. And yes, there’s new merge syntax available so you can include the details in your documents. This update was the result of conversations with several of you. Many shared that consent would typically be captured in their Advice documents (e.g., ATP) or other consent forms. For more information, check out the community article Meeting DBFO informed consent requirements in Xplan. Now that Risk Researcher supports consent tracking, and lets you include it in your documents, we’re also thinking ahead. Are there other ways you’d like to use this data? We’d love to hear your thoughts around any other use cases you see for insurance fee consent. Let us know in this thread!
Ask an Expert: We helped an advice practice map out their entire review process, ask us anything!
Have you tuned in to episode 2 of the new Advisely Growth Masterclass series? If not, I highly encourage you to check out the second episode here. To achieve the efficiencies and scale needed to safely grow their business, Twomeys had to make some big back-office decisions. In this episode, the Tangelo team help them systemise their advice processes whilst factoring in compliance requirements and navigate potential risk. This is a live thread to discuss all things relating to episode 2, so we would love to know: What did you think? What did you learn? Do you have any questions for us? Leave them down below and tag us Tangelo Can't wait to hear your thoughts!What is your number 1 requirement when it comes to managing Client Correspondence?
There is no shortage of correspondence and communications between an Advice Practice and their Client. This can come direct from the client, from their accountant, from fund managers not to mention the correspondence created internally within your business. When it comes to managing these documents, there are many schools of thought around 'how to store' and 'where to store' this correspondance. From CRM solutions to Cloud Storage to internal servers to paper! So many factors need to be considered such as ease-of-access, security, cost to the business, and protection from theft or loss. When it comes to managing your client correspondence, what is your number 1 requirement (or top 3 if you can't narrow it down) and what drove you to pick your current method?What is limiting your efficiency?
It seems between compliance requirements, size of advice documents and the general administration practices need to keep up with, no one is feeling at the top of their game. I would love to hear what areas you are struggling with, or if you have found some solutions that may be helpful to us all!What is your #1 efficiency tip for this year?
Are you streamlining client comms? Automating documentation? Updating your compliance process? Whether you are in the midst of planning, or are already in BAU - what is your number one efficiency tip for this year to ensure you are effective and able to achieve your 2024 goals? Let us know!Who proactively asks their software stack providers about security?
The results are in from ASIC's Cyber Pulse Survey, and the report has been released (12th November 2023). So much to unpack! One of the points they make is around supply chain risk. Without looking at the survey, I'm interested to know your thoughts on the percentage of advice firms that have already asked their software stack providers about the levels of security they have in place and can provide the evidence to show they did their DD. What percentage do you think have this on file?
