The Offshoring Blind Spot: How Poor Systems Cripple Profitability
Australia is experiencing a unique mismatch: adviser head-count has fallen by roughly 40 % since 2019, yet the pool of advice-seeking households keeps growing as 3.6 million baby-boomers move deeper into retirement. For practice owners this means clients are not merely available; they are queuing. The opportunity, however, is only profitable if new business is screened and processed efficiently. Chasing every enquiry dilutes margin and culture, so the first discipline is a strict Ideal Client definition. A prospect must fit your revenue model, complexity sweet spot and advice philosophy before you invest expensive planner hours. Done well, qualification guards scarce resources and sets a high bar for future profitability.
The Real Offshoring Problem: Process, Not People
Many principals blame disappointing offshore results on “quality control”, yet the real culprit is almost always the firm’s internal machinery. When workflows partially live in someone’s head and data standards vary by adviser, exported tasks return riddled with rework. Offshoring magnifies the system already in place: strong SOPs, digital checklists and automated task queues thrive; verbal instructions collapse. The cost is steep - duplicated labour, owner time sunk into fixes and EBIT margins trapped below 20 %. Practices that invest six months documenting processes, training an overseas team leader and embedding secure tech may lift margins to 30 %-plus within the second year.
Rather than abandon global talent, firms must treat the offshore partner as the execution arm of a clearly engineered assembly line. Once instructions are unambiguous and repeatable, offshore staff excel at time-critical admin such as data entry, product research and SoA implementation, freeing onshore advisers for strategy and client coaching.
Marry Ideal Clients with a World-Class Onboarding Machine
After you have filtered prospects, the true leverage appears during onboarding. A well-built procedure locks in client confidence, accelerates fee capture and frees adviser capacity. Offshoring slots perfectly here because the steps are data-heavy but rules-based. For example, document collection, fact-find validation and platform form preparation follow the same sequence every time. When these tasks move offshore, a local paraplanner can oversee multiple files concurrently instead of chasing signatures.
Your onboarding blueprint should incorporate the five qualification checkpoints that signal a client worth serving:
- A clear problem they want solved.
- Authority (and willingness) for both decision-makers to engage.
- A genuine sense of urgency.
- Estimated annual advice fees above your minimum threshold.
- Openness to your recommendations.
With those criteria met, hand the file to an offshore “implementation pod” that follows a digitised, automated playbook: e-sign engagement letter → trigger SharePoint workflow → schedule discovery meeting via Calendly → pre-populate fact-find and risk-profile forms → load data into your CRM. Each click is logged, timestamped and reported back to the adviser dashboard, giving local staff visibility without the drudgery.
The payoff is two-fold. First, capacity scales: one adviser supported by a disciplined offshore cell can service 150 + households at consistent service levels. Second, culture improves: local staff shift from firefighting to high-value conversations, and offshore colleagues enjoy clear KPIs and career pathways instead of ad-hoc requests.
Conclusion
Client demand is surging, and the firms that will capture profitable growth are those that (1) know exactly whom they want to serve, (2) codify every repeatable step, and (3) deploy offshore talent as the engine room of a seamless onboarding experience. The bottleneck is no longer lead flow; it is the owner’s resolve to replace tribal knowledge with procedure. Get that right and offshoring stops being a quality-control headache and becomes the accelerator that turns plentiful prospects into ideal, high-margin clients - efficiently, consistently and at scale.
Mark Lewin
May 2025
2 Replies
- Tamara.Morey
Advisely Partner
I wholeheartedly agree marklewin1 - a sub-standard process can really cripple efficiency, especially for offshore teams. I noticed you referenced paraplanning as staying onshore in your example. In my experience, I've seen good success with offshoring the tasks you've outlined (data collection, implementation etc) but paraplanning tends to break down offshore.
Curious to hear your view - would you agree it's best kept onshore?
- marklewin1Valued Supporter
Hi Tamara, apologies for the delay in responding.
In practical terms, successful SOA construction (paraplanning) can take time, largely due to the challenges of training offshore staff to a level that meets the practice owner's standards in this highly technical area.
What I’ve observed is a common trend: many Australian businesses are comfortable offshoring administration and data entry, but they often stop there. As a result, SOA construction is frequently kept onshore.
That said, I’ve personally seen offshore staff produce high-quality SOAs when given the right training and support. Just as I’ve heard many reasons why a practice won’t offshore at all, I’ve also heard a wide range of experiences, both positive and negative, when it comes to outsourcing SOA production.
This all comes back to the fact that offshoring is a strategic decision. It must be made with a clear understanding of the task at hand, the time it will take, and the resourcing required to properly invest in making it work.
Mark
Welcome to the Advisely forums!
This is where financial advice professionals from all walks of life come together to share knowledge, swap ideas, solve problems, and talk all things growth and efficiency.
Here are some tips when posting in the forums:
- Be respectful and courteous to fellow members
- If a reply helped you, mark it as a solution so other users can find it easily
- Take a moment to read through our Community Guidelines
- For Xplan support issues, it's best to raise a ticket in Iress Connect first. You can also search the discussions for posts about the same issue first before starting a new thread.
- Keep an eye out for our 'Ask me anything (AMA)' threads – these are live text-based Q&As with industry and Xplan experts during a set period of time. Find out when the next one is happening here.
- Don’t be shy! You don’t need to be an expert to help someone out. Many users are looking for practical advice, shared experiences, or just a fresh perspective
- Introduce yourself and meet other members here!
We’re glad you’re here – see you around! 😁
Recent Discussions
🤓 Xplan Hint: When you just want to see the document before completing the wizard in full.
Did you know that the new Xmerge Preview functionality allows you to do just that? This one is for all the paraplanners and advisers who have ever said - “I just want to know where it’s going to en...courtney.youngblutt2 days agoIress Contributor20Views2likes0Comments🤓Xplan Hint: Demystifying Performance Calculations
Did you know you can now export calculation details? Ever looked at a client’s performance in Portfolios and wondered where the figures came from? In case you missed this (relatively) new feature, ...kenny.foo3 days agoIress Contributor34Views4likes1Comment